Any relationship between two entities, either persons or institutions, cannot be established except in accordance with some set of rules. These rules may be unenforceable norms or customs of a group or society, or some explicit laws having a binding and enforceable authority. A contract is a formal structure of a relationship between two or more parties, binding them together into a contractual relationship; and imposing upon them certain obligations and granting them certain rights over each other. In case of any problem with these obligations or rights, law of the land would come into action. But if the contracting parties belong to different lands, then there would arise a question as to law of which land should come into force. If the contracting parties have no earlier consensus over this issue, then it is more likely that the problem would keep unresolved; and one or more parties would suffer the loss. Hence, the need to decide at the time of making contract, as to which law would be followed.
CHOICE OF LAW IN SYNDICATED LOANS AND BONDS:
Similar is the case of the financial contract. ‘Every legal issue under a financial contract must be determined in accordance with a system of law. An aspect of a contract cannot exist in a legal vacuum.'(1) Syndicated loans and bonds are mostly international in their character. They usually include borrowers and lenders from various countries; and ‘the greater the number of countries involved the greater the number of municipal systems of law which have to be considered.'(2) As there is not single set of International laws that could effectively govern the syndicated loans and bonds, it is necessary for the parties to these contracts to choose an agreed system of law.
A syndicated loan agreement typically is contracted between the highly complex institutions like edges, corporations, state corporations, and already the sovereign states themselves. It involves a number of systems of law (already a single bank operating internationally can be unprotected to different systems of law)(3). The international bond issues, too, include issuers and investment edges from different countries. In some respects, international bonds (Eurobonds) are already more ‘international’ than the syndicated loans, as they are sold to the public at large, and the individuals and other entities buy and sell them in numerous jurisdictions. During this course of business a number of transactions involving numerous legal documents take place. With these transactions rights and limitations shift from one entity to another very frequently. When it happens in different systems of law, it creates ambiguity about which law should apply in which case. This ambiguity makes the business unprotected to unpredictable situations. ultimately the whole business market suffers serious damage.
“In order to reduce such uncertainty to a minimum, an attempt is made in practice to apply one system of law to the transaction and to exclude as far as possible the applicability of other systems of law with which the transaction may have some connection. This is generally sought to be achieved in practice by a ‘choice of law’ clause which subjects to one governing system of law _ ‘the proper law’ _ the validity, enforceability and interpretation of the contractual and other legal documents which constitute the transaction.”(4)
The practicality provides the opportunity to the lender to have preference in ‘choice of law’, as in case of a argument, it is his money that would need to be recovered. In case of the Euro bonds, where an investment bank helps in selling securities(5), the situation becomes different, as the lenders appear on scene after the bond is issued under certain terms including the matter of choice of law. In any case, while exercising the choice, it is preferred that such system is chosen that is familiar to the parties, so that the inclination of using certain kind of financial transactions needs not to be changed. Further, the dealing with legal in addition as business issues could be functional. It is also important that the system chosen is greatly mature and the applicable jurisdiction enjoys good reputation for its impartiality. Political stability in that specific jurisdiction and convenience of language are also important factors in choosing a certain system of law(6). The incident of halting of foreign money accounts following imposition of emergency after the atomic tests in 1998(7), the stock market suffered such a huge loss that it took years to retrieve. In such a situation no serious financial activity can grow without fear of the unseen. While the enforcing forum is not less important a factor; the most meaningful factor of having the choice of law clause is the “insulation of the loan contract from legal changes in the borrower’s country.”(8)
While outlining the contract some of the basic documents would be prepared; for example, in case of a bond issue, the subscription agreement, the trust deed, the agreement between managers, the selling group agreement and the bond instruments themselves, and in case of the syndicated loan, the loan agreement. All of these legal documents would require validity, enforceability and when needed interpretation.(9) This could only be done under an agreed system of law.
Determination of rights and limitations and interpretation of the legal documents would include a number of laws applicable to the different issue. These may include the securities law, principles of contract, interpretation of contracts law, insolvency law, negotiable instruments law, and the like. All these laws should relate to one system of law, so as to make their interpretation and implementation possible.(10)
There are more than 310 jurisdictions in the world, which are grouped into nine classes i.e. Traditional English, American shared Law, Mixed Roman/shared law, Germanic and Scandinavian, Mixed Franco-Latin/Germanic, Traditional Franco-Latin, Emerging Jurisdictions, Islamic Jurisdictions and Unallocated Jurisdictions(11). These categories are further combined into three major types: shared Law, Napoleonic and Roman-Germanic jurisdictions.(12) This much number of jurisdictions naturally has a possible to create problems in case of international syndicated loans and bonds where different systems of law would be involved. So, it becomes imperative to have ‘choice of law’ clause in the legal documents.
The term international, in the syndicated loans and bonds, entails multiple laws, forums and jurisdictions. The conflict of laws, in such a case, is natural. Combination of laws, given their different approaches, is not a workable proposition. Harmonization of financial laws at international level is nevertheless an idealistic suggestion. So, to form, interpret and execute the international contracts, there is a need to adopt a single system of law. This, the parties to a contract can choose at the time of the concluding of the contract. This is done to ensure the validity, enforceability and interpretation of all the legal documents applicable to the contracts of syndicated loans and bonds. It helps eliminate the uncertainty and unpredictability of the fate of a contract. Most ideally, it is an external law, having a possible to insulate the loan contract from legal changes, especially, in the borrower’s country. English law worthy of playing such a role. There is another advantage of choosing it: it doesn’t need any connection of the lender or borrower with England.
The basic importance of the inclusion of ‘choice of law clause’ in the international syndicated loan agreements and the legal instruments of the bonds, is to get rid of the uncertainty concerning the expectations about the contract, by providing a workable legal mechanism to resolve all the legal issues which would arise now and then.
1). Wood, P R (1995) International Loans, Bonds and Securities Regulation; London: Sweet & Maxwell P-61
2). Slater R (1982) “Syndicated Bank Loans” presented to the Conference on ‘The Transnational Law of International Commercial Transactions’ at Bielefeld, W. Germany, October 5-7, 1981, in the Journal of Business Law pp 173-199
3). Cranston R (2003) Principles of Banking Law; 2nd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p 438
4). Tennekoon R (1991) The Law and Regulation of International Finance; London: Butterworths; p 16
5). Mishkin F (1992) The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets; 3rd Ed. New York: HarperCollins Publishers; p 286
6). Paul C & Montagu G (2003) Banking and Capital Markets Companion; 3rd Ed. London: Cavendish Publishing; p 94
7). Washingtonpost.com, at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/southasia/stories/pakistan052998.htm visited on 14-05-2005
8). Wood P R (1995) International Loans, Bonds and Securities Regulation; op cit
9). Tennekoon R.. op cit
10). Slater R (1982) op cit
11). Wood P R (1997) Maps of World Financial Law; London: Allen & Overy; p 9
12). Wood, P R (2005) Oxford and Cambridge Introductory Lectures of Financial Law, op cit